Tomorrow two men will “debate” one another as candidates for the office of President. One of these is men is already occupying the White House. The other guy occupied that same building until the current tenant defeated him in the 2020 election. The defeated guy then tried to overthrow the government in order to stay in office. Never mind that such a documented act of sedition/treason (covered LIVE on TV and social media) would seem to disqualify such a threat to democracy, here he is being allowed to posssibly run the government he tried to overthrow.

The winner of the 2020 election, and his United States Attorney General did not immediately arrest the Loser and charge him with sedition/treason. Not sure why not. Feel free to explain that one. Recently, the Loser was found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records. No sentence has yet been handed down. In a civil case, the Loser was found guilty of sexual assault. He was fined millions of dollars. He also is facing 57 more felony counts in federal and state courts. Regardless, the Loser and convicted felon remains a free man. Free to attend the above noted debate tomorrow.

Of course this is utterly absurd. Mr. Loser is still covered feverishly by the corporate media. He spews hate and swears revenge on his political enemies. He has openly declared that, if elected, he will become a dictator on day one. Yet our government is allowing him to run for POTUS again.

One might think he has no chance of getting elected again, However, the current POTUS and his Party seem barely concerned about such an outcome. How so? Well, their candidate is not polling very well against the Loser. What should be a landslide victory for SCOTUS the present and a humiliating defeat for the Loser may be a nail-biter. What is the problem with POTUS the present? Well, his campaign is implicitly based on one platform: he isn’t the Loser.

Also, as documented by the free press and social media, he seems not to want to stop funding a certain foreign country and its military. That foreign country was attacked last October 7. About 1700 of this country’s citizens have been killed in the last eight-plus months. The militant organization that attacked on October 7 has been counter attacked. The citizens of the country in which the militants live have been in the line of fire. 38,000 dead. 15,000 children. The guy who is NOT the Loser thus has been losing support. What can he do? He can stop supporting the country killing all those innocent children. He has the authority to do so. But he doesn’t. Thus there will be many lost votes due to such an immoral minded “leader”.

Regardless, those are the two sanctioned debate candidates for tomorrow. No third party candidates are allowed in the debate. Such an “outsider” would need to poll at least 15%.That is hard to do without media time to promote alternative platforms and proposals. Air time costs a lot of money. The Loser and the guy who is not the Loser get free air time all the time. They can buy ad time too because they have a lot of money. If a third party candidate can’t garner enough money (and it costs a friggin fortune to buy airtime) then such a possible alternative candidate has no way of being much more than a rumor except for social media tidbits about them. Thus we get the above noted two “debaters” from the two major political parties while the means to qualify to also be heard in such a context is next to impossible. How democratic, eh?

Each of these two invited speakers are already legal and moral Losers, propped up by a qualifying process that is inherently un-democratic. One of them has to win (barring a political uprising). But no matter which Loser wins we all lose in such a cynical and sinister electoral system.